|^|

all digital. all tech. all good.

5. October 2010 05:14
by clinton
1088 Comments

Microsofts Framework Vulnerability - Whats scarier, the hole or the public response?

5. October 2010 05:14 by clinton | 1088 Comments

 


The old .NET Framework logo
Image via Wikipedia

Microsoft’s recently revealed security flaw in its. Net framework was publically announced on Scott Guthrie’s blog a few weeks ago. Scott Gu is disputably the most respected voice in the Microsoft developer community. A very plain blog is his testament to his influence; in an industry that values quality information – the community of developers following him is a true testament.

 
When I awoke the morning of the 18th here in Australia, I received Scott’s tweet on the vulnerability. At first I wasn’t too fussed, Microsoft is notoriously full of security holes and this one would need a fair amount of traffic in order to pull off. It’s the vulnerabilities that aren’t posted that scare me.


Arrival at work wasn’t what I had expected. The dev team were all a flutter with the issue and thats when I realized the severity of the vulnerability, not the risk of it occurring before a release patch, but how public this announcement would be. Before I knew it I had clients asking, management asking and every developing discussing the mitigation strategy. 

The mitigation strategy was relatively easy to implement, unless you have a client with over 130 web.config files (whole post itself)
Buzz was allayed and workarounds were implemented, but I still couldn’t shake the feeling of panic that was around me.

Nowdays I’m not too sure which is better or worse, a massive framework vulnerability disseminated to every tom, sue and harry on the internet or the undisclosed equally devastating vulnerability that MS are patching before announcing...

 

blog comments powered by Disqus